Vertaling van "Electronic administration " (Engels → Nederlands) :

electronic government [ e-administration | e-government | electronic administration | online administration ]

e-administration (nom) | e-gov (nom) | e-Gov (nom) | eGovernment (nom) | e-government (nom) | e-Government (nom) | electronic administration (nom) | electronic government (nom) | electronic public administration (nom) | net government (nom) | online administration (nom) | on-line administration (nom) | online government (nom) | on-line government (nom)

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport | United Nations rules for Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport

administrative formalities [ administrative burden | administrative cost | administrative simplification | bureaucracy | cost of administration | cost of administrative formalities | simplification of administrative formalities | Bureaucracy(STW) | bureaucracy(UNBIS) ]

Conditions listed in T82.0 due to:urinary:electronic stimulator device | sphincter implant | stent |

Mechanical complication of cardiac electronic device

Electronic mail | Electronic mailing system | Electronic messaging | E-mail

Electronic mail | Electronic messaging | E-mail

If a supervisory body is not totally independent, as required by the Regulation, it could cause inequality of opportunities between various economic operators, and would breach the internal market of the EU principle. The eIDAS Regulation enables the use of electronic identification means and trust services (i.e. electronic signatures, electronic seals, time stamping, registered electronic delivery and website authentication) by citizens, businesses and public administrations to access on-line services or manage electronic transaction ...[+++]s.

A new Union programme on interoperability solutions and common frameworks for European public administrations, businesses and citizens (the ‘ISA2 programme’) is therefore needed to develop, maintain and promote a holistic approach to interoperability in order to eliminate fragmentation in the interoperability landscape and avoid electronic barriers in the Union; to facilitate efficient and effective electronic cross-border or cross-sector interaction between European public administrations on the one hand, and between European public ...[+++] administrations and businesses and citizens on the other; to identify, create and operate interoperability solutions supporting the implementation of Union policies and activities; and to facilitate the re-use of interoperability solutions by European public administrations.

However, in order to ensure that such electronic signatures receive the same legal recognition as electronic signatures created in an entirely user-managed environment, remote electronic signature service providers should apply specific management and administrative security procedures and use trustworthy systems and products, including secure electronic communication channels, in order to guarantee that the electronic signature creation environment is reliable and is used under the sole control of the signatory.

1. When an electronic identification using an electronic identification means and authentication is required under national law or by administrative practice to access a service provided by a public sector body online in one Member State, the electronic identification means issued in another Member State shall be recognised in the first Member State for the purposes of cross-border authentication for that service online, provided that the following conditions are met: