Vertaling van "restrictive-practice authorization " (Engels → Nederlands) :

restrictive-practice authorisation [ concentration authorisation | restrictive-practice authorization ]

exemption from restrictive-practice authorisation [ exemption from restrictive-practice authorization | Block exemptions(ECLAS) ]

control of restrictive practices [ action against monopolies | action against restrictive practices ]

Advisory Committee on Restrictive Agreements and Dominant Position | Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions | Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and monopolies

Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions in the Field of Concentrations between Undertakings

Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions

The problematic practice of donations to the Ministry, which had been restricted to public authorities and companies, has reportedly been stopped.

Currently, data localisation restrictions by Member States' public authorities and obstacles to the movement of data across IT systems (so-called vendor lock-in practices) prevent business and organisations in the EU from capturing economic, social and business opportunities.

6. Emphasises the necessity of sharing best practices among the Member States; calls for joint cooperation, pooling of know-how and sharing of best practices among market surveillance authorities; recalls the importance of cooperation between customs and market surveillance authorities at the external borders to carry out appropriate checks on products entering the Community; recognises the important contribution made today by PROSAFE as regards the coordination of joint market surveillance actions and the exchange of tried and tested practices in the framework of the GPSD; therefore calls on the Commission to consider under what con ...[+++]ditions PROSAFE could serve as platform for an extended coordination between Member States for harmonised and non-harmonised products; considers it necessary to establish a legal basis and to allocate sufficient resources to PROSAFE to carry out this task; points out that coordination through PROSAFE today is restricted by limited resources and its informal structure;

4. Reiterates its support for the objective of Russia’s accession to the WTO, which will create a level playing field for the business communities on both sides and greatly help Russian efforts to build a modern, diversified, high-technology economy; calls on Russia to take the necessary steps to remove the remaining obstacles to the accession process, namely Russian export duties, the level of railway fees for goods in transit through Russia, road charges on goods vehicles and the restrictions on imports of meat, milk and plant products, following which the EU should open discussions on a free-trade agreement with the Russian Federation; looks forward to the implementation of more effective policies on several outstanding issues, such as ...[+++] intellectual property rights, radioactive waste, nuclear safety, work permits for EU nationals, etc.; stresses the need for the Russian authorities to ensure that no discriminatory practices whatsoever are employed vis-à-vis EU trading partners and investors and to reconsider the measures taken to tackle the economical crisis, in accordance with the undertaking given at the recent G20 Summit; deplores the fact that Russia is still not honouring its commitment to phase out Siberian overflight payments and calls on Russia to sign the agreement reached on this issue at the summit in Samara; welcomes, in this context, the recent decision by Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan to abandon their attempt to join the WTO as a single customs union, which could have added years to the negotiations;