Vertaling van "store-and-forward messaging " (Engels → Nederlands) :

(k)Electronic data interchange (EDI)(l)Enhanced/value added facsimile services, including store and forward, store and retrieve(m)Code and protocol conversion | | | |

(a)voice telephone services(b)packet-switched data transmission services(c)circuit-switched data transmissions services(d)telex services(e)telegraph services(f)facsimile services(g)leased circuit services(h)electronic mail(i)voice mail(j)online information and database retrieval(k)Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)(l)enhanced/value added facsimile services, incl. Store and forward, store and retrieve(m)code and protocol conversion | (1)BG: for facsimile services: only through the use of the international network of BTC Ltd. For leased circuit services: sale and lease of capacity of leased circuits is not allowed.

The current technical characteristics of the SIS must be taken into consideration when setting out the technical requirements for SIS II. Basically, the current function of the system is to validate and forward messages from Member States to all other Member States and to guarantee that all of them have the same data.

The current debate on the nature of the SIS will inevitably have an impact on the technical solution to be considered as there is a significant difference between, for example, a system that only forwards messages and one which would also handle queries from end-users, as some are suggesting.

Whereas it should be made clear that the notification referred to in the first indent of Article 32 (2) of Regulation No 1009/67/EEC places an obligation on the factory or undertaking concerned to keep the quantity carried forward in store during the period referred to in the second indent of the same subparagraph without any reimbursement of storage costs ; whereas it should also be specified that if, despite the obligation to store, that quantity is disposed of during the above-mentioned period storage costs shall not be reimbursed ; whereas, in order to prevent such disposal from making the carry forward system ineffective, it is im ...[+++]portant that the quantity concerned should continue to be treated as production within the basic quota for the following marketing year ; whereas, if that system is to be effective, the production levy applicable during the marketing year in which the sugar was produced should be charged in the event of premature disposal;

WHEREAS , PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 32 ( 2 ) OF REGULATION N 1009/67/EEC , THE MANUFACTURER IS REQUIRED TO KEEP THE QUANTITY OF SUGAR CARRIED FORWARD IN STORE AT HIS OWN EXPENSE FOR A PERIOD OF TWELVE MONTHS WHERE THE SUGAR CARRIED FORWARD IS WITHIN THE MAXIMUM QUOTA , OR FOR A LONGER PERIOD WHERE THE SUGAR CARRIED FORWARD IS OUTSIDE THE MAXIMUM QUOTA ; WHEREAS BY REASON OF THE CARRY-FORWARD NOT ONLY SUGAR MANUFACTURERS BUT ALSO BEET AND CANE GROWERS OBTAIN ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR PRODUCTS SOLD ; WHEREAS IT SHOULD THEREFORE BE POSSIBLE FOR SUGAR MANUFACTURERS TO REQUIRE BEET AND CANE GROWERS TO CONTRIBUTE UP TO A MAXIMUM AMOUNT TOWARDS STORAGE COSTS ; WHEREAS THIS MAXIMUM AMOUNT CAN BE CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON STO ...[+++]RAGE COSTS AND OF THE CONTRIBUTION MADE BY BEET GROWERS TOWARDS OTHER COMMON LEVIES , THAT IS TO SAY ON THE BASIS OF THE REIMBURSEMENT FIXED TO OFFSET STORAGE COSTS AND THE CONTRIBUTION MADE BY BEET GROWERS TO THE PRODUCTION LEVY ;