Vertaling van "technical liabilities " (Engels → Nederlands) :

20. Takes the view that payment service providers should be responsible for the accurate execution of instructions from customers, in accordance with the national laws of the Member States, and should bear the burden of proof once the instruction enters their domain; rejects any extension of strict liability; is of the opinion, however, that within the legal relationship with customers as regards errors of selection, the liability of service providers should also extend to the selection of other intermediary firms and technical facilities used; s ...[+++]uggests that, by way of self-regulation, banking associations, payment network operators and traders should adopt a procedure for settling questions of internal liability promptly; takes the view that the appraisal of liability, where a question of consequential damage or force majeure arises, should be left to national courts;

16. Takes the view that a payment service provider should be responsible for the accurate execution of a payment order under the Member States’ national laws, and be required to prove that it has been, as soon as the customer’s order has entered his domain; rejects any extension of strict liability; is of the opinion, however, that within the legal relationship with his customer as regards errors of selection, the liability of a provider should also extend to other firms in the chain and technical facilities used by him; suggests t ...[+++]hat, through self-regulation, banking associations, network operators and merchants should adopt a procedure for clarifying internal liability questions promptly; takes the view that an appraisal of liability questions in connection with consequential damage and force majeure should be left to national jurisdictions;

To provide an adequate solution to the problem, peculiar to our age of increasing technicality, of a fair apportionment of the risks inherent in modern technological production, the Directive imposes liability on the producer without fault on his part for damage caused by the defectiveness of his products.

the technical options decided on for the final definition phase following the objectives set for the project as regards services, reliability and international cooperation; those options should facilitate the establishment of a public-private partnership and of liability rules;

IVSTRATEGY FOR THE SINGLE MARKET PAGEREF _Toc465771324 \h VCARDIFF ECONOMIC REFORM PROCESS - PLANNING OF WORK PAGEREF _Toc465771325 \h VROLE OF STANDARDISATION IN EUROPE - RESOLUTION PAGEREF _Toc465771326 \h VIMUTUAL RECOGNITION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FOLLOW-UP TO THE ACTION PLAN FOR THE SINGLE MARKET - RESOLUTION PAGEREF _Toc465771327 \h XIBETTER LAWMAKING AND LEGISLATIVE SIMPLIFICATION (SLIM) PAGEREF _Toc465771328 \h XIIIRESALE RIGHT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE AUTHOR OF AN ORIGINAL WORK OF ART PAGEREF _Toc465771329 \h XIVDIRECTIVE CONCERNING TAKEOVER BIDS (13th COMPANY LAW DIRECTIVE) PAGEREF _Toc465771330 \h XIVVERTICAL DIRECTIVES IN THE FOODSTUFFS SECTOR PAGEREF _Toc465771331 \h XIV-CERTAIN PARTIALLY OR TOTALLY DEHYDRATED PRESERVED MILKS INTE ...[+++]NDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION PAGEREF _Toc465771332 \h XIV-CERTAIN SUGARS INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION PAGEREF _Toc465771333 \h XIVGREEN PAPER ON LIABILITY FOR DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS PAGEREF _Toc465771334 \h XVCOCOA AND CHOCOLATE PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION PAGEREF _Toc465771335 \h XVANY OTHER BUSINESS PAGEREF _Toc465771336 \h XVI-AGREEMENT WITH THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON FOUR DIRECTIVES PAGEREF _Toc465771337 \h XVIITEMS APPROVED WITHOUT DEBATE PAGEREF _Toc465771338 \h XIXINTERNAL MARKET PAGEREF _Toc465771339 \h XIX--Technical harmonisation of motor vehicles (interior fittings) PAGEREF _Toc465771340 \h XIXCULTURE PAGEREF _Toc465771341 \h XX--Integrating History into the Community's Cultural Action PAGEREF _Toc465771342 \h XXENERGY PAGEREF _Toc465771343 \h XX--Multiannual programmes SAVE II and ALTERNER II PAGEREF _Toc465771344 \h XX_________________

ANNEXE Question 1: Taking account of what is technically feasible and economically reasonable, what should be the liability of different operators in the content communication chain, from the content creator to the final user ?