Vertaling van "concessi aiuti nella " (Italiaans → Engels) :

32. Acknowledges the problems regarding investment aid to large enterprises indicated by the Commission, given that evidence suggests a lack of incentive effect; believes that, although State aid should be primarily provided to SMEs, excluding large enterprises, a category which also includes family-owned enterprises exceeding the definition of SMEs or mid-cap companies, from State aid rules in areas covered by Article 107(3)(c) TFEU is not justified given their contribution to employment, the supply chains they create with SMEs, their common involvement in innovation, research and development, and their positive role in combating the economic crisis; takes the view that the presence of large undertakings is often key to the success of SM ...[+++]Es that benefit from clusters led by large companies and from their subcontracting activities; recalls that it was the Commission itself that recognised the contribution of investment by large enterprises to creating knock-on effects and to access for the EU to the world markets; stresses that a decision to exclude large enterprises in “”‘c’ areas could lead to job losses, reduced economic activity in the regions, reduced regional competitiveness, reduced attractiveness for foreign investment and the relocation of companies to other regions either within or outside the EU; considers, therefore, that such companies should remain eligible for State aid in “”‘c’ areas, subject to particular scrutiny following individual notification and to additional compatibility criteria concerning incentive effect and contribution to regional development through clusters and subcontracting;

It is time the Commission took this in hand and not only made statements – as Mrs Kroes and you have done – but also had its services actually obtain the business plan and take a look at whether or not illegal aid has been granted.

18. Maintains that a regulatory framework needs to be laid down, at EU level, to penalise company relocations within and outside the EU; believes that public aid to businesses, at national and European level, must be subject to long-term commitments on their part regarding regional development and employment and that no aid of any kind should be granted if it could serve to encourage relocations; calls for a stronger role for workers’ representatives in company boards and in fundamental organisational decision-making;

Undertakings that are active in the processing and marketing of agricultural products listed in Annex 1 to the Treaty may be granted ‘de minimis’ aid of up to EUR 200 000 over a period of three fiscal years, provided of course that a series of conditions are fulfilled.

In order to ensure transparency and effective monitoring, in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 994/98, it is appropriate to establish a standard format in which Member States should provide the Commission with summary information whenever, in pursuance of this Regulation, an aid scheme is implemented or an individual aid outside such schemes is granted, with a view to publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

9. Urges ACP Member States to be more transparent in the presentation of their defence and security budgets and requests the Council and the Commission to determine a ceiling for military expenditure above which aid or debt relief is no longer provided - determining the ceiling should be accompanied by a rigorous system of monitoring movements and trade on parallel markets; also calls on the Council and the Commission for a general arms embargo in the Great Lakes region;