Vertaling van "mancanza di voce " (Italiaans → Engels) :

The European Parliament recognises the weaknesses and problems caused by the lack of legally binding powers and the disconnectedness of the global financial and economic institutions. It therefore highlights the urgent need to develop legitimate, effective and efficient institutions for global economic governance, which build on, complete and improve the current set of institutions, such as the UN, the IMF, the Basel Committee, the IASB and IOSCO; finally, the European Parliament concludes that the European Union needs to speak with one voice at these institutions in order to maximise its influence and impact.

Now is not a good time for new divisions and a breakdown in trust. People will believe in us only if we are firm and united from within, and only if our voice is the common voice of the 27 Member States and not just that of a handful of Member States.

How else can we justify its frequent use of the RAL mechanism when settling the annual Community budget, depriving Latin America of funds included in the budget at great pains, not so much because of the lack of take-up capacity on the part of beneficiaries, but rather because of the lack of motivation, ideas and exciting strategic projects for a region where arbitrary cuts have frequently been made in favour of other interests and areas?

"The compensatory amount referred to in the second and third subparagraphs of Article 3 (6) of Regulation No 136/66/EEC may be fixed, subject to the other conditions laid down in those subparagraphs, in respect of imports of oils falling within heading No 15.07 of the Common Customs Tariff, with the exception of olive oil, other than refined olive oil falling within sub-heading No 15.07 A II if the prices of these oils on importation into the Community: (a) are lower than the prices which would be established for these products in the absence of subsidies or premiums for the production, manufacture, exportation or transport of oils, granted directly or indirectly by the exporting country or the country of origin, irrespective of the grounds for, nat ...[+++]ure of or manner of granting those subsidies or premiums;

WHEREAS CERTAIN OF THESE PREPARATIONS ARE CLEARLY NOT INTENDED FOR CONSUMPTION IN THE UNALTERED STATE AS SAUCES , MIXED CONDIMENTS OR MIXED SEASONINGS ; WHEREAS , THEREFORE , SUCH PREPARATIONS DO NOT SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO USE OF PRODUCTS FALLING WITHIN HEADING N 21.04 OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF , AS APPEARS FROM THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE BRUSSELS NOMENCLATURE , AND CONSEQUENTLY CANNOT BE CLASSIFIED UNDER THIS HEADING ; WHEREAS IN THE ABSENCE OF A MORE SPECIFIC CLASSIFICATION THEY MUST BE CLASSIFIED UNDER HEADING N 21.07 OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF ;

WHEREAS THESE PREPARATIONS CONSIST MAINLY OF FOODSTUFFS FALLING WITHIN CHAPTERS 1 TO 21 OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF ; WHEREAS FURTHERMORE THESE PREPARATIONS , BECAUSE OF THEIR USE AS ADDITIVES IN FOODSTUFFS FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION AND OF THEIR COMPOSITION , HAVE A CLOSER CONNECTION WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRIES THAN WITH THE CHEMICAL OR ALLIED INDUSTRIES ; WHEREAS THEREFORE THESE PREPARATIONS CANNOT BE INCLUDED IN HEADING N 38.19 OF THE COMMON CUSTOMS TARIFF BUT MUST BE CLASSIFIED UNDER A HEADING WHICH COMPRISES PRODUCTS FOR USE AS FOODSTUFFS FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION ; WHEREAS , IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY MORE SPECIFIC HEADING , THEY MUST BE CLASSIFIED UNDER HEADING N 21.07 ;