Vertaling van "hearing evidence " (Engels → Nederlands) :

hearing of evidence | hearing of witnesses

evidence produced at the hearing

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

adjust a hearing aid | tune hearing aids | adjust hearing aids | tune hearing aid

recommend a hearing aid | support purchase of hearing aids | advise on hearing aids | recommend hearing aids

perform repairs for a hearing aid | undertake repairs for hearing aids | perform a repair for a hearing aid | perform repairs for hearing aids

interim injunction judge | judge hearing applications for interim relief | judge hearing applications for provisional relief | judge hearing interim injunction proceedings | judge hearing the application for interim relief | judge in interlocutory proceedings | summary trial judge

Syndrome with characteristics of moderate to profound hearing loss in both ears and severe nearsightedness (high myopia). The hearing loss may be described as sensorineural or it may be caused by auditory neuropathy. The hearing loss is either presen

Definition: Dissociative stupor is diagnosed on the basis of a profound diminution or absence of voluntary movement and normal responsiveness to external stimuli such as light, noise, and touch, but examination and investigation reveal no evidence of a physical cause. In addition, there is positive evidence of psychogenic causation in the form of recent stressful events or problems.

Conductive hearing loss, unilateral with unrestricted hearing on the contralateral side

C. whereas the controversial trial failed to meet national and international standards of justice, notwithstanding the call of the United Nations for fairness and transparency in the legal proceedings against former president Nasheed: he was manhandled outside the courtroom and was frequently denied legal representation, the court refused to hear evidence from his own defence witnesses, his legal team was denied adequate time to build a defence against the charges, and the criminal court refuses to release the case report to his defence team, necessary for them to lodge the appeal;

If the answer to questions 10 and 12 is that the tax authority of the Member State may use such evidence in the administrative procedure, is the tax authority of the Member State required, in order to guarantee the effectiveness of the right to good administration and the rights of the defence pursuant to Articles 7, 8, 41 and 48 of the Charter, in conjunction with Article 51(1) of the Charter, to hear the taxable person in the course of the administrative procedure, to guarantee him access to the conclusions suggested by the information obtained without his knowledge and to respect the purpose for which the data ...[+++]appearing in the evidence were obtained, or, in that context, does the fact that the information collected without the knowledge of the person concerned is intended solely for an investigation of a criminal nature prevent from the outset the use of such evidence?

Those minutes shall contain an indication of the case, the date, time and place of the hearing, if applicable an indication that the hearing was in camera, the names of the Judges and the Registrar present, the names and capacities of the representatives of the parties present, of applicants in person and of the witnesses or experts examined, an indication of the evidence or procedural documents produced at the hearing and, in so far as is necessary, the statements made at the hearing and the decisions pronounced at the hearing by the ...[+++] Tribunal or the President.

It should be indicated which of the facts described in the grounds are to be stated in the taking of evidence (e.g. reading the document at the hearing, hearing the witness(es), hearing the creditor or his/her legal representative, hearing the debtor, etc.).