Vertaling van "Indipendenza del giudice " (Italiaans → Engels) :

judge [ children's magistrate | examining magistrate | the bench ]

principle of the independence of the judiciary | principle of independence | independence of the judiciary | independence

national independence [ national dependence | political independence | Independence(ECLAS) | Secession(STW) ]

referring judge

self-sufficiency in food [ dependency on food aid | self-sufficiency in agricultural produce ]

judge in a commercial court

commissaire | match referee | on-ice official | sport official

judge reviewing a case

employment tribunal judge | employment tribunal

The presumption of innocence would be infringed if the burden of proof were shifted from the prosecution to the defence, without prejudice to any ex officio fact-finding powers of the court, to the independence of the judiciary when assessing the guilt of the suspect or accused person, and to the use of presumptions of fact or law concerning the criminal liability of a suspect or accused person.

As regards the issue of judicial independence in Hungary more generally, the Commission expressed its concerns in a number of letters in 2012, in particular the powers of the Hungarian President of the National Judicial Office to reallocate cases from one court to another and to transfer a judge against his or her will.

Born 1952; law degree at the University of Vilnius (1974-79); Doctor of Legal Science of the Law University of Lithuania (1999); Member of the Lithuanian Bar (1979-90); Member of the Supreme Council (Parliament) of the Republic of Lithuania (1990-92), then Member of the Seimas(Parliament) of the Republic of Lithuania and Member of the Seimas‘ State and Law Committee (1992-96); Judge at the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania (1996-2005), then Adviser to the President of the Lithuanian Constitutional Court (from 2006); Lecturer in the Constitutional Law Department of the Law Faculty of Mykolas Romeris University (1997-2000), then Associate Professor (2000-04) and Professor (from 2004) in that department, and finally Head ...[+++]of the department (2005-07); Dean of the Law Faculty of Mykolas Romeris University (2007-10); Member of the Venice Commission (2006-10); signatory of the act of 11 March 1990 re-establishing Lithuania’s independence; author of numerous legal publications; Judge at the Court of Justice since 6 October 2010.

For the purposes of the present appeal, it must first be stated that the Civil Service Tribunal recalled that any decision relating to a specific individual which is taken under the Staff Regulations and adversely affects that person must state the reasons on which it is based, on the one hand, to enable the competent court to review the legality of the decision and, on the other, to provide the person concerned with the information necessary to allow him to ascertain whether or not the decision is well founded and to enable him to decide whether to bring an action. It added, however, referring to Case C‑254/95 P Parliament v Innamorati ...[+++][1996] ECR I‑3423, paragraphs 24 to 28, that, as far as concerns decisions taken by a selection board in a competition, the obligation to state reasons must be reconciled with observance of the secrecy surrounding the proceedings of selection boards by virtue of Article 6 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations, secrecy which was instituted with a view to guaranteeing the independence of selection boards and the objectivity of their proceedings. Thus, observance of this secrecy precludes both disclosure of the attitudes adopted by individual members of selection boards and disclosure of any factors relating to individual or comparative assessments of candidates and that the obligation to state the reasons on which decisions of a selection board in a competition are based must take account of the nature of the proceedings concerned, which, at the stage of examination of the abilities of the candidates, are primarily comparative in character and accordingly covered by the secrecy inherent in those proceedings (paragraphs 30 and 31 of the judgment under appeal).